🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or deny at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive assaults on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being justified by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a British mosque. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you probably cannot establish limits at democracy," commented a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's truly occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can propose that protests opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "complicit" in alleged abuse experienced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for holding signs opposing mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our liberties. We may ultimately regret how easily we allowed them to slip away.