🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue worked, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is treading a difficult path since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states exercised their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in some form if discussions resume.

The US president in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the conference, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He said the attacks commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their will during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and respect, they will get a response in the same tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."